https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207489 --- Comment #8 from Pol Van Aubel (linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) --- Yes, that does seem to fix it. Though I must admit I'm a bit wary about lines 196-199 of that patch, that looks suspiciously preemptible. I'm not a kernel expert in any way, shape, or form, so I'm not sure whether preemption is even of any concern here; but is there a reason for not using atomic_cmpxchg there instead of separate atomic_read and atomic_inc? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug.
