On 29/04/20 19:28, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > This seems functional, but I'm wondering if it could a bit simpler and > more efficient if the data structure was a normal descriptor ring with > the same number slots as whatever the maximum number of waiting pages > is. Then there would never need to be any notification from the guest > back to the host, since there would always be room for a notification. No, it would be much more complicated code for a slow path which is already order of magnitudes slower than a vmexit. It would also use much more memory. > It might be even better if a single unified data structure was used > for both notifications. That's a very bad idea since one is synchronous and one is asynchronous. Part of the proposal we agreed upon was to keep "page not ready" synchronous while making "page ready" an interrupt. The data structure for "page not ready" will be #VE. Paolo
