Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 00/10] s390x: Testing the Channel Subsystem I/O

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/21/20 6:18 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 21.04.20 18:13, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2020-02-20 13:00, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>
>> ...snip...
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Pierre Morel (10):
>>>    s390x: saving regs for interrupts
>>>    s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart
>>>    s390x: cr0: adding AFP-register control bit
>>>    s390x: export the clock get_clock_ms() utility
>>
>> Please can you consider applying these 4 patches only.
>> I will send some changes I made for the patches on css tests.
>>
> 
> The first one requires a little more brain power - can anybody at IBM
> help reviewing that?
> 

I'll try to understand it :)

But I think we need a new series anyway.
@Pierre: You told me, that you removed delay() and this series still has
it. With the changes needed to the second patch and the delay change we
need all information to make decisions, so a new version of the series
would make sense.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux