Re: [PATCH] KVM: Optimize kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tianjia,

On 2020-04-13 04:45, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run() is only called in the file kvm_main.c,
where vcpu->run is the kvm_run parameter, so it has been replaced.

Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 ++++----
 virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 3bf2ecafd027..70e3f4abbd4d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -8726,18 +8726,18 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu
*vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
 		r = -EAGAIN;
 		if (signal_pending(current)) {
 			r = -EINTR;
-			vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTR;
+			kvm_run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTR;
 			++vcpu->stat.signal_exits;
 		}
 		goto out;
 	}

-	if (vcpu->run->kvm_valid_regs & ~KVM_SYNC_X86_VALID_FIELDS) {
+	if (kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs & ~KVM_SYNC_X86_VALID_FIELDS) {
 		r = -EINVAL;
 		goto out;
 	}

-	if (vcpu->run->kvm_dirty_regs) {
+	if (kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs) {
 		r = sync_regs(vcpu);
 		if (r != 0)
 			goto out;
@@ -8767,7 +8767,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu
*vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)

 out:
 	kvm_put_guest_fpu(vcpu);
-	if (vcpu->run->kvm_valid_regs)
+	if (kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs)
 		store_regs(vcpu);
 	post_kvm_run_save(vcpu);
 	kvm_sigset_deactivate(vcpu);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
index 48d0ec44ad77..ab9d7966a4c8 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_run *run)
 		return ret;

 	if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_MMIO) {
-		ret = kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu, vcpu->run);
+		ret = kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu, run);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 	}

Do you have any number supporting the idea that you are optimizing anything here? Performance, code size, register pressure or any other relevant metric?

Thanks,

        M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux