Hello Brijesh, On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 09:26:26AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote: > > On 3/30/20 11:45 AM, Ashish Kalra wrote: > > Hello Brijesh, > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:00:14AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote: > >> On 3/30/20 1:23 AM, Ashish Kalra wrote: > >>> From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@xxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> Reset the host's page encryption bitmap related to kernel > >>> specific page encryption status settings before we load a > >>> new kernel by kexec. We cannot reset the complete > >>> page encryption bitmap here as we need to retain the > >>> UEFI/OVMF firmware specific settings. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@xxxxxxx> > >>> --- > >>> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c > >>> index 8fcee0b45231..ba6cce3c84af 100644 > >>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c > >>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c > >>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ > >>> #include <asm/hypervisor.h> > >>> #include <asm/tlb.h> > >>> #include <asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h> > >>> +#include <asm/e820/api.h> > >>> > >>> static int kvmapf = 1; > >>> > >>> @@ -357,6 +358,33 @@ static void kvm_pv_guest_cpu_reboot(void *unused) > >>> */ > >>> if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_EOI)) > >>> wrmsrl(MSR_KVM_PV_EOI_EN, 0); > >>> + /* > >>> + * Reset the host's page encryption bitmap related to kernel > >>> + * specific page encryption status settings before we load a > >>> + * new kernel by kexec. NOTE: We cannot reset the complete > >>> + * page encryption bitmap here as we need to retain the > >>> + * UEFI/OVMF firmware specific settings. > >>> + */ > >>> + if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_SEV_LIVE_MIGRATION) && > >>> + (smp_processor_id() == 0)) { > >> > >> In patch 13/14, the KVM_FEATURE_SEV_LIVE_MIGRATION is set > >> unconditionally and because of that now the below code will be executed > >> on non-SEV guest. IMO, this feature must be cleared for non-SEV guest to > >> avoid making unnecessary hypercall's. > >> > >> > > I will additionally add a sev_active() check here to ensure that we don't make the unnecassary hypercalls on non-SEV guests. > > > IMO, instead of using the sev_active() we should make sure that the > feature is not enabled when SEV is not active. > Yes, now the KVM_FEATURE_SEV_LIVE_MIGRATION feature is enabled dynamically in svm_cpuid_update() after it gets called from svm_launch_finish(), which ensures that it only gets set when a SEV guest is active. Thanks, Ashish > > >>> + unsigned long nr_pages; > >>> + int i; > >>> + > >>> + for (i = 0; i < e820_table->nr_entries; i++) { > >>> + struct e820_entry *entry = &e820_table->entries[i]; > >>> + unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn; > >>> + > >>> + if (entry->type != E820_TYPE_RAM) > >>> + continue; > >>> + > >>> + start_pfn = entry->addr >> PAGE_SHIFT; > >>> + end_pfn = (entry->addr + entry->size) >> PAGE_SHIFT; > >>> + nr_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(entry->size, PAGE_SIZE); > >>> + > >>> + kvm_sev_hypercall3(KVM_HC_PAGE_ENC_STATUS, > >>> + entry->addr, nr_pages, 1); > >>> + } > >>> + } > >>> kvm_pv_disable_apf(); > >>> kvm_disable_steal_time(); > >>> } > > Thanks, > > Ashish