Re: [kvm-unit-tests v2] s390x/smp: add minimal test for sigp sense running status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/2/20 1:02 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> make sure that sigp sense running status returns a sane value for

s/m/M/

> stopped CPUs. To avoid potential races with the stop being processed we
> wait until sense running status is first 0.

ENOPARSE "...is first 0?"

> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  lib/s390x/smp.c |  2 +-
>  lib/s390x/smp.h |  2 +-
>  s390x/smp.c     | 13 +++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/smp.c b/lib/s390x/smp.c
> index 5ed8b7b..492cb05 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/smp.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/smp.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ bool smp_cpu_stopped(uint16_t addr)
>  	return !!(status & (SIGP_STATUS_CHECK_STOP|SIGP_STATUS_STOPPED));
>  }
>  
> -bool smp_cpu_running(uint16_t addr)
> +bool smp_sense_running_status(uint16_t addr)
>  {
>  	if (sigp(addr, SIGP_SENSE_RUNNING, 0, NULL) != SIGP_CC_STATUS_STORED)
>  		return true;
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/smp.h b/lib/s390x/smp.h
> index a8b98c0..639ec92 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/smp.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/smp.h
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ struct cpu_status {
>  int smp_query_num_cpus(void);
>  struct cpu *smp_cpu_from_addr(uint16_t addr);
>  bool smp_cpu_stopped(uint16_t addr);
> -bool smp_cpu_running(uint16_t addr);
> +bool smp_sense_running_status(uint16_t addr);

That's completely unrelated to the test

>  int smp_cpu_restart(uint16_t addr);
>  int smp_cpu_start(uint16_t addr, struct psw psw);
>  int smp_cpu_stop(uint16_t addr);
> diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
> index 79cdc1f..b4b1ff2 100644
> --- a/s390x/smp.c
> +++ b/s390x/smp.c
> @@ -210,6 +210,18 @@ static void test_emcall(void)
>  	report_prefix_pop();
>  }
>  
> +static void test_sense_running(void)
> +{
> +	report_prefix_push("sense_running");
> +	/* make sure CPU is stopped */
> +	smp_cpu_stop(1);
> +	/* wait for stop to succeed. */
> +	while(smp_sense_running_status(1));
> +	report(!smp_sense_running_status(1), "CPU1 sense claims not running");

That's basically true anyway after the loop, no?

> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +
>  /* Used to dirty registers of cpu #1 before it is reset */
>  static void test_func_initial(void)
>  {
> @@ -319,6 +331,7 @@ int main(void)
>  	test_store_status();
>  	test_ecall();
>  	test_emcall();
> +	test_sense_running();
>  	test_reset();
>  	test_reset_initial();
>  	smp_cpu_destroy(1);
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux