On 30.03.20 15:09, Janosch Frank wrote: > On 3/30/20 3:03 PM, Janosch Frank wrote: >> On 3/30/20 2:50 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> On 30.03.20 14:20, Janosch Frank wrote: >>>> + report(data->vm[0].total_cpus == smp_query_num_cpus(), "cpu # total"); >>>> + report(data->vm[0].conf_cpus == smp_query_num_cpus(), "cpu # configured"); >>>> + report(data->vm[0].standby_cpus == 0, "cpu # standby"); >>>> + report(data->vm[0].reserved_cpus == 0, "cpu # reserved"); >>> >>> IIRC, using -smp 1,maxcpus=X, you could also test the reported reserved >>> CPUs. >> >> Will try that > > Just like I thought, QEMU does not manipulate cpu counts and KVM > pre-sets standby and reserved to 0. So we have absolutely no change when > adding the smp parameter. Well, for TCG it is properly implemented. Is this a BUG in KVM's STSI code? -- Thanks, David / dhildenb