Hi, On 3/30/20 11:11 AM, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:46:57AM +0200, Auger Eric wrote: >> Hi Zenghui, >> >> On 3/30/20 10:30 AM, Zenghui Yu wrote: >>> Hi Eric, >>> >>> On 2020/3/20 17:24, Eric Auger wrote: >>>> +static void its_cmd_queue_init(void) >>>> +{ >>>> + unsigned long order = get_order(SZ_64K >> PAGE_SHIFT); >>>> + u64 cbaser; >>>> + >>>> + its_data.cmd_base = (void *)virt_to_phys(alloc_pages(order)); >>> >>> Shouldn't the cmd_base (and the cmd_write) be set as a GVA? >> yes it should > > If it's supposed to be a virtual address, when why do the virt_to_phys? What is programmed in CBASER register is a physical address. So the virt_to_phys() is relevant. The inconsistency is in its_allocate_entry() introduced later on where I return the physical address instead of the virtual address. I will fix that. > >>> >>> Otherwise I think we will end-up with memory corruption when writing >>> the command queue. But it seems that everything just works fine ... >>> So I'm really confused here :-/ >> I was told by Paolo that the VA/PA memory map is flat in kvmunit test. > > What does flat mean? Yes I meant an identity map. kvm-unit-tests, at least arm/arm64, does prepare > an identity map of all physical memory, which explains why the above > is working. should be the same on x86 It's doing virt_to_phys(some-virt-addr), which gets a > phys addr, but when the ITS uses it as a virt addr it works because > we *also* have a virt addr == phys addr mapping in the default page > table, which is named "idmap" for good reason. > > I think it would be better to test with the non-identity mapped addresses > though. is there any way to exercise a non idmap? Thanks Eric > > Thanks, > drew > >> >>> >>>> + >>>> + cbaser = ((u64)its_data.cmd_base | (SZ_64K / SZ_4K - 1) | >>>> GITS_CBASER_VALID); >>>> + >>>> + writeq(cbaser, its_data.base + GITS_CBASER); >>>> + >>>> + its_data.cmd_write = its_data.cmd_base; >>>> + writeq(0, its_data.base + GITS_CWRITER); >>>> +} >>> >>> Otherwise this looks good, >>> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Thanks! >> >> Eric >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >> >>