On 20.03.20 21:55, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Reset the LRU slot if it becomes invalid when deleting a memslot to fix
> an out-of-bounds/use-after-free access when searching through memslots.
>
> Explicitly check for there being no used slots in search_memslots(), and
> in the caller of s390's approximation variant.
>
> Fixes: 36947254e5f9 ("KVM: Dynamically size memslot array based on number of used slots")
> Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 3 +++
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 3 +++
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 807ed6d722dd..cb15fdda1fee 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -2002,6 +2002,9 @@ static int kvm_s390_get_cmma(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_cmma_log *args,
Adding Claudio, but
> struct kvm_memslots *slots = kvm_memslots(kvm);
> struct kvm_memory_slot *ms;
>
> + if (unlikely(!slots->used_slots))
> + return 0;
> +
this looks sane and like the right fix.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> cur_gfn = kvm_s390_next_dirty_cmma(slots, args->start_gfn);
> ms = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, cur_gfn);
> args->count = 0;
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index 35bc52e187a2..b19dee4ed7d9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1032,6 +1032,9 @@ search_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn)
> int slot = atomic_read(&slots->lru_slot);
> struct kvm_memory_slot *memslots = slots->memslots;
>
> + if (unlikely(!slots->used_slots))
> + return NULL;
> +
> if (gfn >= memslots[slot].base_gfn &&
> gfn < memslots[slot].base_gfn + memslots[slot].npages)
> return &memslots[slot];
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 28eae681859f..f744bc603c53 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -882,6 +882,9 @@ static inline void kvm_memslot_delete(struct kvm_memslots *slots,
>
> slots->used_slots--;
>
> + if (atomic_read(&slots->lru_slot) >= slots->used_slots)
> + atomic_set(&slots->lru_slot, 0);
> +
> for (i = slots->id_to_index[memslot->id]; i < slots->used_slots; i++) {
> mslots[i] = mslots[i + 1];
> slots->id_to_index[mslots[i].id] = i;
>
