On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:49 AM Nick Desaulniers
<ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> So maybe we can find why
> commit 76b043848fd2 ("x86/retpoline: Add initial retpoline support")
> added THUNK_TARGET with and without "m" constraint, and either:
> - remove "m" from THUNK_TARGET. (Maybe this doesn't compile somewhere)
> or
> - use my above recommendation locally avoiding THUNK_TARGET. We can
> use "r" rather than "a" (what Clang would have picked) or "b (what GCC
> would have picked) to give the compilers maximal flexibility.
So I've sent a patch for the latter; my reason for not pursuing the former is:
1. I assume that the thunk target could be spilled, or a pointer, and
we'd like to keep flexibility for the general case of inline asm that
doesn't modify the stack pointer.
2. `entry` is local to `handle_external_interrupt_irqoff`; it's not
being passed in via pointer as a function parameter.
3. register pressure is irrelevant if the resulting code is incorrect.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
