On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 04:58:35PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Super nit: can I convince you to use "KVM: VMX:" instead of "KVM: x86: VMX:"? > > > > $ glo | grep -e "KVM: x86: nVMX" -e "KVM: x86: VMX:" | wc -l > > 8 > > $ glo | grep -e "KVM: nVMX" -e "KVM: VMX:" | wc -l > > 1032 > > > > I'm very conditioned to scan for "KVM: *VMX:", e.g. I was about to complain > > that this used the wrong scope :-) And in the event that Intel adds a new > > technology I'd like to be able to use "KVM: Intel:" and "KVM: ***X:" > > instead of "KVM: x86: Intel:" and "KVM: x86: Intel: ***X:" for code that is > > common to Intel versus specific to a technology. > > What if someone else adds VMX instead? :-) I never said it was a _good_ plan :-D
