Re: [PATCH v2 61/66] KVM: x86: Don't propagate MMU lpage support to memslot.disallow_lpage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 04:31:15PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 03/03/20 00:57, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Stop propagating MMU large page support into a memslot's disallow_lpage
> > now that the MMU's max_page_level handles the scenario where VMX's EPT is
> > enabled and EPT doesn't support 2M pages.
> > 
> > No functional change intended.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 3 ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c     | 6 ++----
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > index f8eb081b63fe..1fbe54dc3263 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > @@ -7698,9 +7698,6 @@ static __init int hardware_setup(void)
> >  	if (!cpu_has_vmx_tpr_shadow())
> >  		kvm_x86_ops->update_cr8_intercept = NULL;
> >  
> > -	if (enable_ept && !cpu_has_vmx_ept_2m_page())
> > -		kvm_disable_largepages();
> > -
> >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
> >  	if (ms_hyperv.nested_features & HV_X64_NESTED_GUEST_MAPPING_FLUSH
> >  	    && enable_ept) {
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index 4fdf5b04f148..cc9b543d210b 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -9863,11 +9863,9 @@ static int kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> >  		ugfn = slot->userspace_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >  		/*
> >  		 * If the gfn and userspace address are not aligned wrt each
> > -		 * other, or if explicitly asked to, disable large page
> > -		 * support for this slot
> > +		 * other, disable large page support for this slot.
> >  		 */
> > -		if ((slot->base_gfn ^ ugfn) & (KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level) - 1) ||
> > -		    !kvm_largepages_enabled()) {
> > +		if ((slot->base_gfn ^ ugfn) & (KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level) - 1)) {
> >  			unsigned long j;
> >  
> >  			for (j = 0; j < lpages; ++j)
> > 
> 
> This should technically go in the next patch.

Hmm, yeah, I agree.  IIRC I split it this way so that the next patch didn't
touch any arch code, but removing only the call to kvm_disable_largepages()
would be cleaner.



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux