On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 04:25:34PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 25/02/20 16:18, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > Would it be better or worse if we eliminate set_supported_cpuid() hook > > completely by doing an ugly hack like (completely untested): > > Yes, it makes sense. Works for me, I'll tack it on. I think my past self kept it because I was planning on using vmx_set_supported_cpuid() for SGX, which adds multiple sub-leafs, but I'm pretty sure I can squeeze them into kvm_cpu_caps with a few extra shenanigans.
