Re: [PATCH] KVM: Fix some obsolete comments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Fix some obsolete comments
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 07:30:35 -0800
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>, "kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "x86@xxxxxxxxxx" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx" <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>, "rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx" <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>, "wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx" <wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx" <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>, "joro@xxxxxxxxxx" <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>, "tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mingo@xxxxxxxxxx" <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "bp@xxxxxxxxx" <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, "hpa@xxxxxxxxx" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <3e25a121a6754020ac3a1eda9fb7fad6@huawei.com>
References: <3e25a121a6754020ac3a1eda9fb7fad6@huawei.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 01:48:28AM +0000, linmiaohe wrote:
> Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >linmiaohe <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> throws
> >> - * #UD or #GP.
> >> + * #UD, #GP or #SS.
> >
> >Oxford comma, anyone? :-)))
> 
> I have no strong preference. ^_^

I'm also a fan of the Oxford comma when it comes to describing code.

References:
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: Fix some obsolete comments
  - From: linmiaohe

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] KVM: x86: Refactor emulated exception injection to take the emul context
Next by Date: [PATCH] Revert "KVM: x86: enable -Werror"
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Fix some obsolete comments
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Fix some obsolete comments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux