On 07/02/20 20:53, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>
>> 2) Return -EINVAL instead.
> I agree that it _should_ be -EINVAL, but I just don't think it's worth
> the possibility of breaking (stupid) userspace that was doing something
> like:
>
> for (i = 0; i < max_cpuid_size; i++) {
> cpuid.nent = i;
>
> r = ioctl(fd, KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID, &cpuid);
> if (!r || r != -E2BIG)
> break;
> }
>
Apart from the stupidity of the above case, why would it be EINVAL?
I can do the change to drop the initializer when applying.
Paolo
