Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: virtio-serial: An interface for host-guest communication

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anthony Liguori wrote:

There is nothing sane about vmchannel. It's just an attempt to bypass QEMU which is going to introduce all sorts of complexities wrt migration, guest compatibility, etc.

However, as I've mentioned repeatedly, the reason I won't merge virtio-serial is that it duplicates functionality with virtio-console. If the two are converged, I'm happy to merge it. I'm not opposed to having more functionality.

NB: the userspace interface for these devices should be a tty, not a new character device.

If you want to add a new bustype for these devices, and then have an entry in sysfs that had some sort of identification string, that's perfectly acceptable.

Also note though that this is exactly what usb-serial is today. /sys/bus/usbserial contains all the usb serial devices and you can get a vendor id/device id to uniquely identify the device type.

Using virtio vs. usb has it's advantage but the userspace interface model should be roughly equivalent.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux