Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >linmiaohe <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> @@ -4505,7 +4505,6 @@ static bool rmode_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vec) >> case GP_VECTOR: >> case MF_VECTOR: >> return true; >> - break; >> } >> return false; >> } > >Unrelated to your change but what I don't in rmode_exception() is the second "/* fall through */" instead of just 'return true;', it makes it harder to read. Agree. I will do it in another patch as it's unrelated to this one. Many Thanks for your review and advice.
