On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 19:23, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 17/02/20 11:36, Wanpeng Li wrote: > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > > index fb5d64e..d0ba2d4 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > > @@ -9390,8 +9390,9 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > if (!kvmclock_periodic_sync) > > return; > > > > - schedule_delayed_work(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_sync_work, > > - KVMCLOCK_SYNC_PERIOD); > > + if (kvm->created_vcpus == 1) > > + schedule_delayed_work(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_sync_work, > > + KVMCLOCK_SYNC_PERIOD); > > This is called with kvm->lock not held, so you can have > kvm->created_vcpus == 2 by the time you get here. You can test instead > "if (vcpu->vcpu_idx == 0)". Agreed. Wanpeng