Re: [RFCv2 34/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add UV debug trace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:32:26 +0100
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 06.02.20 10:41, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> 
> > 
> > You often seem to log in pairs (into the per-vm dbf and into the new uv
> > dbf). Would it make sense to introduce a new helper for that, or is
> > that overkill?  
> 
> I think I had now a good idea.
> 
> I will let KVM_UV_EVENT always log into both logs (the per KVM and the global one).
> If it is important enough for the global one it really should also be in the 
> per kvm one. So I will split out all messages into the separate patches and
> move this infrastructure at the beginning of the patch series.
> Then we only need one line of code for each log. 
> 

I think that makes a lot of sense.




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux