Re: [Autotest] [KVM-AUTOTEST PATCH 07/12] KVM test: kvm_config.py: do not fail when including a nonexistent file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Michael Goldish<mgoldish@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ----- "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" <lmr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I quite didn't like the above, because to issue messages like that we
>> should be using the logging infrastructure to avoid to write WARNING,
>> DEBUG and similar strings. Anyway, I understand why kvm_config.py is
>> still using print's. I will apply this, but will send later a patch
>> that makes kvm_config.py to use the logging infrastructure.
>
> Can we use the logging infrastructure in stand-alone modules?

Yes, we can, we have logging_manager and logging_config have what is
needed. I am going to send a patch showing how to do it with
kvm_config.py.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux