Re: [RFC] eventfd: add EFD_AUTORESET flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/02/2020 12.47, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 12/02/20 11:29, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 09:31:32AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 29/01/20 18:20, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
+	/* Semaphore semantics don't make sense when autoreset is enabled */
+	if ((flags & EFD_SEMAPHORE) && (flags & EFD_AUTORESET))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
I think they do, you just want to subtract 1 instead of setting the
count to 0.  This way, writing 1 would be the post operation on the
semaphore, while poll() would be the wait operation.
True!  Then EFD_AUTORESET is not a fitting name.  EFD_AUTOREAD or
EFD_POLL_READS?
Avi's suggestion also makes sense.  Switching the event loop from poll()
to IORING_OP_POLL_ADD would be good on its own, and then you could make
it use IORING_OP_READV for eventfds.

In QEMU parlance, perhaps you need a different abstraction than
EventNotifier (let's call it WakeupNotifier) which would also use
eventfd but it would provide a smaller API.  Thanks to the smaller API,
it would not need EFD_NONBLOCK, unlike the regular EventNotifier, and it
could either set up a poll() handler calling read(), or use
IORING_OP_READV when io_uring is in use.


Just to be clear, for best performance don't use IORING_OP_POLL_ADD, just IORING_OP_READ. That's what you say in the second paragraph but the first can be misleading.





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux