Re: [PATCH 01/26] KVM: x86: Remove superfluous brackets from case statement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Remove unnecessary brackets from a case statement that unintentionally
> encapsulates unrelated case statements in the same switch statement.
> While technically legal and functionally correct syntax, the brackets
> are visually confusing and potentially dangerous, e.g. the last of the
> encapsulated case statements has an undocumented fall-through that isn't
> flagged by compilers due the encapsulation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 7e3f1d937224..24597526b5de 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -5260,7 +5260,7 @@ static void kvm_init_msr_list(void)
>  				 !intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_single_range_output)))
>  				continue;
>  			break;
> -		case MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_A ... MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR3_B: {
> +		case MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_A ... MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR3_B:
>  			if (!kvm_x86_ops->pt_supported() ||
>  				msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_A >=
>  				intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_num_address_ranges) * 2)
> @@ -5275,7 +5275,7 @@ static void kvm_init_msr_list(void)
>  			if (msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 >=
>  			    min(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, x86_pmu.num_counters_gp))
>  				continue;
> -		}
> +			break;
>  		default:
>  			break;
>  		}

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Vitaly




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux