On 04.02.20 13:20, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 03.02.20 14:19, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> We have two new SIE exit codes dealing with instructions.
>> 104 (0x68) for a secure instruction interception, on which the SIE needs
>> hypervisor action to complete the instruction. We can piggy-back on the
>> existing instruction handlers.
>>
>> 108 which is merely a notification and provides data for tracking and
>> management. For example this is used to tell the host about a new value
>> for the prefix register. As there will be several special case handlers
>> in later patches, we handle this in a separate function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
>> arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index d63ed05272ec..58845b315be0 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -217,6 +217,8 @@ struct kvm_s390_sie_block {
>> #define ICPT_KSS 0x5c
>> #define ICPT_PV_MCHKR 0x60
>> #define ICPT_PV_INT_EN 0x64
>> +#define ICPT_PV_INSTR 0x68
>> +#define ICPT_PV_NOTIF 0x6c
>
> NOTIFY? NOTIFICATION? NOTIF is weird.
ack. I used NOTIFY to keep the numbers aligned.
>
>> __u8 icptcode; /* 0x0050 */
>> __u8 icptstatus; /* 0x0051 */
>> __u16 ihcpu; /* 0x0052 */
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
>> index eaa2a21c3170..4b3fbbde1674 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
>> @@ -444,6 +444,11 @@ static int handle_operexc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_OPERATION);
>> }
>>
>> +static int handle_pv_not(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> "notification" please. not not. You see why ;)
ack.
