Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] selftests: KVM: testing the local IRQs resets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/30/20 11:55 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:03:12 -0500
> Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Local IRQs are reset by a normal cpu reset.  The initial cpu reset and
>> the clear cpu reset, as superset of the normal reset, both clear the
>> IRQs too.
>>
>> Let's inject an interrupt to a vCPU before calling a reset and see if
>> it is gone after the reset.
>>
>> We choose to inject only an emergency interrupt at this point and can
>> extend the test to other types of IRQs later.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> You probably should add your s-o-b here as well.
> 
>> ---
>>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/resets.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/resets.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/resets.c
>> index 2b2378cc9e80..299c1686f98c 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/resets.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/resets.c
>> @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@
>>  #include "kvm_util.h"
>>  
>>  #define VCPU_ID 3
>> +#define LOCAL_IRQS 32
> 
> Why 32?
> 
>> +
>> +struct kvm_s390_irq buf[VCPU_ID + LOCAL_IRQS];
>>  
>>  struct kvm_vm *vm;
>>  struct kvm_run *run;
>> @@ -52,6 +55,29 @@ static void test_one_reg(uint64_t id, uint64_t value)
>>  	TEST_ASSERT(eval_reg == value, "value == %s", value);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void assert_noirq(void)
>> +{
>> +	struct kvm_s390_irq_state irq_state;
>> +	int irqs;
>> +
>> +	if (!(kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_S390_INJECT_IRQ) &&
>> +	    kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_S390_IRQ_STATE)))
>> +		return;
> 
> Might want to do a
> 
> irq_introspection_supported = (check stuff);
> 
> once for this test? Works fine as is, of course.
> 
>> +
>> +	irq_state.len = sizeof(buf);
>> +	irq_state.buf = (unsigned long)buf;
>> +	irqs = _vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_S390_GET_IRQ_STATE, &irq_state);
>> +	/*
>> +	 * irqs contains the number of retrieved interrupts, apart from the
>> +	 * emergency call that should be cleared by the resets, there should be
>> +	 * none.
> 
> Even if there were any, they should have been cleared by the reset,
> right?

Yes, that's what "there should be none" should actually express.
I added the comment before sending out.

> 
>> +	 */
>> +	if (irqs < 0)
>> +		printf("Error by getting IRQ: errno %d\n", errno);
> 
> "Error getting pending IRQs" ?

"Could not fetch IRQs: errno %d\n" ?

> 
>> +
>> +	TEST_ASSERT(!irqs, "IRQ pending");
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void assert_clear(void)
>>  {
>>  	struct kvm_sregs sregs;
>> @@ -93,6 +119,31 @@ static void assert_initial(void)
>>  static void assert_normal(void)
>>  {
>>  	test_one_reg(KVM_REG_S390_PFTOKEN, KVM_S390_PFAULT_TOKEN_INVALID);
>> +	assert_noirq();
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int inject_irq(int cpu_id)
> 
> You never seem to check the return code.
> 
>> +{
>> +	struct kvm_s390_irq_state irq_state;
>> +	struct kvm_s390_irq *irq = &buf[0];
>> +	int irqs;
>> +
>> +	if (!(kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_S390_INJECT_IRQ) &&
>> +	    kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_S390_IRQ_STATE)))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	/* Inject IRQ */
>> +	irq_state.len = sizeof(struct kvm_s390_irq);
>> +	irq_state.buf = (unsigned long)buf;
>> +	irq->type = KVM_S390_INT_EMERGENCY;
>> +	irq->u.emerg.code = cpu_id;
>> +	irqs = _vcpu_ioctl(vm, cpu_id, KVM_S390_SET_IRQ_STATE, &irq_state);
>> +	if (irqs < 0) {
>> +		printf("Error by injecting INT_EMERGENCY: errno %d\n", errno);
> 
> "Error injecting EMERGENCY IRQ" ?

Sounds good

> 
>> +		return errno;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void test_normal(void)
>> @@ -105,6 +156,8 @@ static void test_normal(void)
>>  
>>  	_vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
>>  
>> +	inject_irq(VCPU_ID);
>> +
>>  	vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_S390_NORMAL_RESET, 0);
>>  	assert_normal();
>>  	kvm_vm_free(vm);
>> @@ -122,6 +175,8 @@ static int test_initial(void)
>>  
>>  	rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
>>  
>> +	inject_irq(VCPU_ID);
>> +
>>  	vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_S390_INITIAL_RESET, 0);
>>  	assert_normal();
>>  	assert_initial();
>> @@ -141,6 +196,8 @@ static int test_clear(void)
>>  
>>  	rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
>>  
>> +	inject_irq(VCPU_ID);
>> +
>>  	vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_S390_CLEAR_RESET, 0);
>>  	assert_normal();
>>  	assert_initial();
> 
> On the whole, looks good to me.
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux