Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: Add XXX UAPI notes for swapped registers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 01:26:32PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Many thanks for this. Comments below.
> 
> On 2020-01-20 13:08, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > Two UAPI system register IDs do not derive their values from the
> > ARM system register encodings. This is because their values were
> > accidentally swapped. As the IDs are API, they cannot be changed.
> > Add XXX notes to point them out.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/virt/kvm/api.txt    |  8 ++++++++
> >  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 11 +++++++++--
> >  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.txt
> > b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.txt
> > index ebb37b34dcfc..11556fc457c3 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.txt
> > @@ -2196,6 +2196,14 @@ arm64 CCSIDR registers are demultiplexed by
> > CSSELR value:
> >  arm64 system registers have the following id bit patterns:
> >    0x6030 0000 0013 <op0:2> <op1:3> <crn:4> <crm:4> <op2:3>
> > 
> > +XXX: Two system register IDs do not follow the specified pattern.
> > These
> > +     are KVM_REG_ARM_TIMER_CVAL and KVM_REG_ARM_TIMER_CNT, which map to
> > +     system registers CNTV_CVAL_EL0 and CNTVCT_EL0 respectively.  These
> > +     two had their values accidentally swapped, which means TIMER_CVAL
> > is
> > +     derived from the register encoding for CNTVCT_EL0 and TIMER_CNT is
> > +     derived from the register encoding for CNTV_CVAL_EL0.  As this is
> > +     API, it must remain this way.
> 
> Is 'XXX' an establiched way of documenting this kind of misfeature?
> I couldn't find any other occurrence in Documentation, but I haven't
> searched very hard.

I didn't find anything claiming it was the standard way of doing it. I
also considered using 'NOTE', but I was afraid it wouldn't stand out
as a "problem" enough. And, even though 'BUG' would certainly stand out,
I felt it implied we should be posting a fix.

Anyway, I'd be happy to change it to whatever the consensus is.

Thanks,
drew

> 
> If nobody has a better idea, I'll queue it as is.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>         M.
> -- 
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
> 




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux