On 1/17/20 12:09 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 07:22, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 1/16/20 5:46 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 11:32, Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I and Xiang are willing to review the APEI-related patches and
volunteer as the reviewers for the HEST/GHES part.
Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Xiang Zheng <zhengxiang9@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
MAINTAINERS | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 387879a..5af70a5 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1423,6 +1423,15 @@ F: tests/bios-tables-test.c
F: tests/acpi-utils.[hc]
F: tests/data/acpi/
+ACPI/HEST/GHES
+R: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@xxxxxxxxxx>
+R: Xiang Zheng <zhengxiang9@xxxxxxxxxx>
+L: qemu-arm@xxxxxxxxxx
+S: Maintained
+F: hw/acpi/ghes.c
+F: include/hw/acpi/ghes.h
+F: docs/specs/acpi_hest_ghes.rst
+
ppc4xx
M: David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
L: qemu-ppc@xxxxxxxxxx
--
Michael, Igor: since this new MAINTAINERS section is
moving files out of the 'ACPI/SMBIOS' section that you're
currently responsible for, do you want to provide an
acked-by: that you think this division of files makes sense?
The files are not 'moved out', Michael and Igor are still the
maintainers of the supported ACPI/SMBIOS subsystem:
Does get_maintainer.pl print the answers for all matching
sections, rather than just the most specific, then?
Yes:
$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f hw/acpi/ghes.c
Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@xxxxxxxxxx> (reviewer:ACPI/HEST/GHES)
Xiang Zheng <zhengxiang9@xxxxxxxxxx> (reviewer:ACPI/HEST/GHES)
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> (supporter:ACPI/SMBIOS)
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@xxxxxxxxxx> (supporter:ACPI/SMBIOS)
qemu-arm@xxxxxxxxxx (open list:ACPI/HEST/GHES)
qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx (open list:All patches CC here)
In any case, I'd still like an acked-by from them.
Sure :)
