On 08/01/20 20:15, Peter Xu wrote: > But you seemed to have fixed that already? :) Perhaps. :) > 3898da947bba ("KVM: avoid using rcu_dereference_protected", 2017-08-02) > > And this path is after kvm_destroy_vm() so kvm->users_count should be 0. > Or I feel like we need to have more places to take the lock.. Yeah, it should be okay assuming you test with lockdep. Paolo