On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 02:26:24PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 07/30/2009 02:16 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: >>> I think there's little reason now. One thing we need to do is make it >>> possible to call the injection code twice without entering the guest. I >>> think right now it assumes nothing has been injected. >>> >>> >> I Looked at this and it seems the current code handle this case. >> Injection puts an event on a queue and if we haven't entered a guest >> after this point on the next entry event is injected from the queue, >> just like if injection failed due to IDT access. >> >> > > Good (it was one of the goals of the original interrupt rework, ~2 years > ago) > But if we emulate an injection by playing with guest memory and registers we have to be sure we do it only once. -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
