On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:26:02PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 07/29/2009 04:13 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > >On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:13:35PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >>I don't see the benefit of this patch. Accessing the cache is just > >>as expensive as accessing the real vmcb. > > > >The benefit is that we don't have to gup and map the nested vmcb just > >for checking who will take the intercept. > > Makes sense. > > >Another reason is that with > >this patch the behavior of nested SVM is more aligned to real hardware. > > Even more important, please put this in the commit log. Ok, will do. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
