On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 16:24:18 +0100 Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2019-12-13 10:43, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Dec 2019 19:20:07 +0100 > > Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On 2019-12-12 15:10, Pierre Morel wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 2019-12-12 13:26, Cornelia Huck wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 16:46:09 +0100 > >>>> Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>>>> + > >>>>> + senseid.cu_type = buffer[2] | (buffer[1] << 8); > >>>> > >>>> This still looks odd; why not have the ccw fill out the senseid > >>>> structure directly? > >>> > >>> Oh sorry, you already said and I forgot to modify this. > >>> thanks > >> > >> hum, sorry, I forgot, the sense structure is not padded so I need this. > > > > Very confused; I see padding in the senseid structure? (And what does > > padding have to do with it?) > > Sorry my fault: > I wanted to say packed and... I forgot to pack the senseid structure. > So I change this. Ah, good :) > > > > > Also, you only copy the cu type... it would really be much better if > > you looked at the whole structure you got back from the hypervisor; > > that would also allow you to do some more sanity checks etc. If you > > really can't pass in a senseid structure directly, just copy everything > > you got? > > > > No I can, just need to work properly ;) > > I will only check on the cu_type but report_info() on all fields. Sounds good!