Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 2/9] s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2019-12-12 10:31, Janosch Frank wrote:
On 12/11/19 4:46 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
This patch defines the PSW bits EA/BA used to initialize the PSW masks
for exceptions.

Since some PSW mask definitions exist already in arch_def.h we add these
definitions there.
We move all PSW definitions together and protect assembler code against
C syntax.

Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 16 ++++++++++++----
  s390x/cstart64.S         | 15 ++++++++-------
  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
index cf6e1ca..b6bb8c1 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
@@ -10,15 +10,22 @@
  #ifndef _ASM_S390X_ARCH_DEF_H_
  #define _ASM_S390X_ARCH_DEF_H_
+#define PSW_MASK_IO 0x0200000000000000UL

That's new and not used in this patch, please move it to the patch where
it's needed.

OK, I can do this.


+#define PSW_MASK_EXT			0x0100000000000000UL
+#define PSW_MASK_DAT			0x0400000000000000UL
+#define PSW_MASK_PSTATE			0x0001000000000000UL
+#define PSW_MASK_BA			0x0000000080000000UL
+#define PSW_MASK_EA			0x0000000100000000UL
+
+
+#define PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK (PSW_MASK_EA|PSW_MASK_BA)
+
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLER__

\n


OK

  struct psw {
  	uint64_t	mask;
  	uint64_t	addr;
  };
-#define PSW_MASK_EXT 0x0100000000000000UL
-#define PSW_MASK_DAT			0x0400000000000000UL
-#define PSW_MASK_PSTATE			0x0001000000000000UL
-
  #define CR0_EXTM_SCLP			0X0000000000000200UL
  #define CR0_EXTM_EXTC			0X0000000000002000UL
  #define CR0_EXTM_EMGC			0X0000000000004000UL
@@ -272,3 +279,4 @@ static inline int stsi(void *addr, int fc, int sel1, int sel2)
  }
#endif
+#endif

Please add a comment to which ifdef this endif belongs.


OK

diff --git a/s390x/cstart64.S b/s390x/cstart64.S
index ff05f9b..56a2045 100644
--- a/s390x/cstart64.S
+++ b/s390x/cstart64.S
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
   */
  #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
  #include <asm/sigp.h>
+#include <asm/arch_def.h>
.section .init @@ -214,19 +215,19 @@ svc_int: .align 8
  reset_psw:
-	.quad	0x0008000180000000
+	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK
  initial_psw:
-	.quad	0x0000000180000000, clear_bss_start
+	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK, clear_bss_start
  pgm_int_psw:
-	.quad	0x0000000180000000, pgm_int
+	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK, pgm_int
  ext_int_psw:
-	.quad	0x0000000180000000, ext_int
+	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK, ext_int
  mcck_int_psw:
-	.quad	0x0000000180000000, mcck_int
+	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK, mcck_int
  io_int_psw:
-	.quad	0x0000000180000000, io_int
+	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK, io_int
  svc_int_psw:
-	.quad	0x0000000180000000, svc_int
+	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK, svc_int


  initial_cr0:
  	/* enable AFP-register control, so FP regs (+BFP instr) can be used */
  	.quad	0x0000000000040000

Could you maybe also fix that up in a separate patch and use the same
constant in lib/s390x/smp.c

Yes, OK.

regards,
Pierre

--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux