Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 02:26:19PM +0800, linmiaohe wrote: >> From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Miaohe Lin (6): >> KVM: Fix some wrong function names in comment >> KVM: Fix some out-dated function names in comment >> KVM: Fix some comment typos and missing parentheses >> KVM: Fix some grammar mistakes >> KVM: hyperv: Fix some typos in vcpu unimpl info >> KVM: Fix some writing mistakes > >Regarding the patch organizing, I'd probably group the comment changes based on what files they touch as opposed to what type of comment issue they're fixing. > >E.g. three patches for the comments > > KVM: VMX: Fix comment blah blah blah > KVM: x86: Fix comment blah blah blah > KVM: Fix comment blah blah blah > >and one patch for the print typo in hyperv > > KVM: hyperv: Fix some typos in vcpu unimpl info > >For KVM, the splits don't matter _that_ much since they more or less all get routed through the maintainers/reviewers, but it is nice when patches can be contained to specific subsystems/areas as it allows people to easily skip over patches that aren't relevant to them. > Many thanks for your advice and patient explanation. I feel sorry for my poor patch organizing. I would reorganize my patches. Thanks again.
