Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 3/3] s390x: SCLP unit test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/19/19 10:53 AM, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> SCLP unit test. Testing the following:
> 
> * Correctly ignoring instruction bits that should be ignored
> * Privileged instruction check
> * Check for addressing exceptions
> * Specification exceptions:
>   - SCCB size less than 8
>   - SCCB unaligned
>   - SCCB overlaps prefix or lowcore
>   - SCCB address higher than 2GB
> * Return codes for
>   - Invalid command
>   - SCCB too short (but at least 8)
>   - SCCB page boundary violation
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  s390x/Makefile      |   1 +
>  s390x/sclp.c        | 465 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  s390x/unittests.cfg |   3 +
>  3 files changed, 469 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 s390x/sclp.c
> 
> diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
> index 3744372..ddb4b48 100644
> --- a/s390x/Makefile
> +++ b/s390x/Makefile
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/diag288.elf
>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/stsi.elf
>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/skrf.elf
>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/smp.elf
> +tests += $(TEST_DIR)/sclp.elf
>  tests_binary = $(patsubst %.elf,%.bin,$(tests))
>  
>  all: directories test_cases test_cases_binary
> diff --git a/s390x/sclp.c b/s390x/sclp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..aeb0b04
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/s390x/sclp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,465 @@
> +/*
> + * Service Call tests
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2019 IBM Corp
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + *  Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2.
> + */
> +
> +#include <libcflat.h>
> +#include <asm/page.h>
> +#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
> +#include <asm/interrupt.h>
> +#include <sclp.h>
> +
> +#define PGM_NONE	1
> +#define PGM_BIT_SPEC	(1ULL << PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION)
> +#define PGM_BIT_ADDR	(1ULL << PGM_INT_CODE_ADDRESSING)
> +#define PGM_BIT_PRIV	(1ULL << PGM_INT_CODE_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION)
> +#define MKPTR(x) ((void *)(uint64_t)(x))
> +
> +/* two pages of scratch memory to be used for some of the tests */
> +static uint8_t pagebuf[PAGE_SIZE * 2] __attribute__((aligned(PAGE_SIZE * 2)));
> +/* used as prefix when testing prefix access, to guarantee that prefix != 0 */
> +static uint8_t prefix_buf[PAGE_SIZE * 2] __attribute__((aligned(PAGE_SIZE * 2)));

"to guarantee that prefix != 0" ... also returns in an error when used
as a sccb address?


> +/* SCCB template used to */

Used to what? :-)

> +static uint8_t sccb_template[PAGE_SIZE];

> +/* the valid command code to use for getting SCP information */

/* The sccb command code we'll use for the "read info" command. */

> +static uint32_t valid_code;

That's an unfortunate name for this variable.
How about: read_info_cmd_code?


> +/* points to lowcore (real address 0) */
> +static struct lowcore *lc;

I'd guess that a comment for this variable is a bit pointless.


I find this hard to read with all the comments above.

> +
> +/**
> + * Perform one service call, handling exceptions and interrupts.
> + */
> +static int sclp_service_call_test(unsigned int command, void *sccb)
> +{
> +	int cc;
> +
> +	sclp_mark_busy();
> +	sclp_setup_int();
> +	cc = servc(command, __pa(sccb));
> +	if (lc->pgm_int_code) {
> +		sclp_handle_ext();
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +	if (!cc)
> +		sclp_wait_busy();
> +	return cc;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Perform one test at the given address, optionally using the SCCB template,
> + * checking for the expected program interrupts and return codes.
> + *
> + * The parameter buf_len indicates the number of bytes of the template that
> + * should be copied to the test address, and should be 0 when the test
> + * address is invalid, in which case nothing is copied.
> + *
> + * The template is used to simplify tests where the same buffer content is
> + * used many times in a row, at different addresses.
> + *
> + * Returns true in case of success or false in case of failure
> + */
> +static bool test_one_sccb(uint32_t cmd, uint8_t *addr, uint16_t buf_len, uint64_t exp_pgm, uint16_t exp_rc)
> +{
> +	SCCBHeader *h = (SCCBHeader *)addr;
> +	int res, pgm;
> +
> +	/* Copy the template to the test address if needed */
> +	if (buf_len)
> +		memcpy(addr, sccb_template, buf_len);
> +	expect_pgm_int();
> +	/* perform the actuall call */

s/actuall/actual/

> +	res = sclp_service_call_test(cmd, h);
> +	if (res) {
> +		report_info("SCLP not ready (command %#x, address %p, cc %d)", cmd, addr, res);
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +	pgm = clear_pgm_int();
> +	/* Check if the program exception was one of the expected ones */
> +	if (!((1ULL << pgm) & exp_pgm)) {
> +		report_info("First failure at addr %p, buf_len %d, cmd %#x, pgm code %d",
> +				addr, buf_len, cmd, pgm);
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +	/* Check if the response code is the one expected */
> +	if (exp_rc && exp_rc != h->response_code) {
> +		report_info("First failure at addr %p, buf_len %d, cmd %#x, resp code %#x",
> +				addr, buf_len, cmd, h->response_code);
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Wrapper for test_one_sccb to set up a simple SCCB template.
> + *
> + * The parameter sccb_len indicates the value that will be saved in the SCCB
> + * length field of the SCCB, buf_len indicates the number of bytes of
> + * template that need to be copied to the actual test address. In many cases
> + * it's enough to clear/copy the first 8 bytes of the buffer, while the SCCB
> + * itself can be larger.
> + *
> + * Returns true in case of success or false in case of failure
> + */
> +static bool test_one_simple(uint32_t cmd, uint8_t *addr, uint16_t sccb_len,
> +			uint16_t buf_len, uint64_t exp_pgm, uint16_t exp_rc)
> +{
> +	memset(sccb_template, 0, sizeof(sccb_template));
> +	((SCCBHeader *)sccb_template)->length = sccb_len;
> +	return test_one_sccb(cmd, addr, buf_len, exp_pgm, exp_rc);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Test SCCB lengths < 8.
> + */
> +static void test_sccb_too_short(void)
> +{
> +	int len;
> +
> +	for (len = 0; len < 8; len++)
> +		if (!test_one_simple(valid_code, pagebuf, len, 8, PGM_BIT_SPEC, 0))
> +			break;
> +
> +	report("SCCB too short", len == 8);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Test SCCBs that are not 64-bit aligned.
> + */
> +static void test_sccb_unaligned(void)
> +{
> +	int offset;
> +
> +	for (offset = 1; offset < 8; offset++)
> +		if (!test_one_simple(valid_code, offset + pagebuf, 8, 8, PGM_BIT_SPEC, 0))
> +			break;
> +	report("SCCB unaligned", offset == 8);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Test SCCBs whose address is in the lowcore or prefix area.
> + */
> +static void test_sccb_prefix(void)
> +{
> +	uint8_t scratch[2 * PAGE_SIZE];
> +	uint32_t prefix, new_prefix;
> +	int offset;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * copy the current lowcore to the future new location, otherwise we
> +	 * will not have a valid lowcore after setting the new prefix.
> +	 */
> +	memcpy(prefix_buf, 0, 2 * PAGE_SIZE);
> +	/* save the current prefix (it's probably going to be 0) */
> +	asm volatile("stpx %0" : "=Q" (prefix));

s390x/intercept.c already uses it, maybe we can move it to the library
along with spx?

> +	/*
> +	 * save the current content of absolute pages 0 and 1, so we can
> +	 * restore them after we trash them later on
> +	 */
> +	memcpy(scratch, (void *)(intptr_t)prefix, 2 * PAGE_SIZE);
> +	/* set the new prefix to prefix_buf */
> +	new_prefix = (uint32_t)(intptr_t)prefix_buf;
> +	asm volatile("spx %0" : : "Q" (new_prefix) : "memory");
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * testing with SCCB addresses in the lowcore; since we can't
> +	 * actually trash the lowcore (unsurprisingly, things break if we
> +	 * do), this will be a read-only test.
> +	 */
> +	for (offset = 0; offset < 2 * PAGE_SIZE; offset += 8)
> +		if (!test_one_sccb(valid_code, MKPTR(offset), 0, PGM_BIT_SPEC, 0))
> +			break;
> +	report("SCCB low pages", offset == 2 * PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * this will trash the contents of the two pages at absolute
> +	 * address 0; we will need to restore them later.
> +	 */
> +	for (offset = 0; offset < 2 * PAGE_SIZE; offset += 8)
> +		if (!test_one_simple(valid_code, MKPTR(new_prefix + offset), 8, 8, PGM_BIT_SPEC, 0))
> +			break;
> +	report("SCCB prefix pages", offset == 2 * PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +	/* restore the previous contents of absolute pages 0 and 1 */
> +	memcpy(prefix_buf, 0, 2 * PAGE_SIZE);
> +	/* restore the prefix to the original value */
> +	asm volatile("spx %0" : : "Q" (prefix) : "memory");
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Test SCCBs that are above 2GB. If outside of memory, an addressing
> + * exception is also allowed.
> + */
> +static void test_sccb_high(void)
> +{
> +	SCCBHeader *h = (SCCBHeader *)pagebuf;
> +	uintptr_t a[33 * 4 * 2 + 2];	/* for the list of addresses to test */
> +
> +	uint64_t maxram;
> +	int i, pgm, len = 0;
> +
> +	h->length = 8;
> +	/* addresses with 1 bit set in the first 33 bits */
> +	for (i = 0; i < 33; i++)
> +		a[len++] = 1UL << (i + 31);
> +	/* addresses with 2 consecutive bits set in the first 33 bits */
> +	for (i = 0; i < 33; i++)
> +		a[len++] = 3UL << (i + 31);
> +	/* addresses with all bits set in bits 0..N */
> +	for (i = 0; i < 33; i++)
> +		a[len++] = 0xffffffff80000000UL << i;
> +	/* addresses with all bits set in bits N..33 */
> +	a[len++] = 0x80000000;
> +	for (i = 1; i < 33; i++, len++)
> +		a[len] = a[len - 1] | (1UL << (i + 31));
> +	/* all the addresses above, but adding the offset of a valid buffer */
> +	for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> +		a[len + i] = a[i] + (intptr_t)h;
> +	len += i;
> +	/* two more hand-crafted addresses */
> +	a[len++] = 0xdeadbeef00000000;
> +	a[len++] = 0xdeaddeadbeef0000;
> +
> +	maxram = get_ram_size();
> +	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> +		pgm = PGM_BIT_SPEC | (a[i] >= maxram ? PGM_BIT_ADDR : 0);
> +		if (!test_one_sccb(valid_code, (void *)a[i], 0, pgm, 0))
> +			break;
> +	}
> +	report("SCCB high addresses", i == len);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Test invalid commands, both invalid command detail codes and valid
> + * ones with invalid command class code.
> + */
> +static void test_inval(void)
> +{
> +	const uint16_t res = SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND;
> +	uint32_t cmd;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("Invalid command");
> +	for (i = 0; i < 65536; i++) {
> +		cmd = 0xdead0000 | i;
> +		if (!test_one_simple(cmd, pagebuf, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, PGM_NONE, res))
> +			break;
> +	}
> +	report("Command detail code", i == 65536);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
> +		cmd = (valid_code & ~0xff) | i;
> +		if (cmd == valid_code)
> +			continue;
> +		if (!test_one_simple(cmd, pagebuf, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, PGM_NONE, res))
> +			break;
> +	}
> +	report("Command class code", i == 256);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +
> +/**
> + * Test short SCCBs (but larger than 8).
> + */
> +static void test_short(void)
> +{
> +	const uint16_t res = SCLP_RC_INSUFFICIENT_SCCB_LENGTH;
> +	int len;
> +
> +	for (len = 8; len < 144; len++)
> +		if (!test_one_simple(valid_code, pagebuf, len, len, PGM_NONE, res))
> +			break;
> +	report("Insufficient SCCB length (Read SCP info)", len == 144);
> +
> +	for (len = 8; len < 40; len++)
> +		if (!test_one_simple(SCLP_READ_CPU_INFO, pagebuf, len, len, PGM_NONE, res))
> +			break;
> +	report("Insufficient SCCB length (Read CPU info)", len == 40);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Test SCCB page boundary violations.
> + */
> +static void test_boundary(void)
> +{
> +	const uint32_t cmd = SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_DATA;
> +	const uint16_t res = SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION;
> +	WriteEventData *sccb = (WriteEventData *)sccb_template;
> +	int len, offset;
> +
> +	memset(sccb_template, 0, sizeof(sccb_template));
> +	sccb->h.function_code = SCLP_FC_NORMAL_WRITE;
> +	for (len = 32; len <= 4096; len++) {
> +		offset = len & 7 ? len & ~7 : len - 8;
> +		for (offset = 4096 - offset; offset < 4096; offset += 8) {
> +			sccb->h.length = len;
> +			if (!test_one_sccb(cmd, offset + pagebuf, len, PGM_NONE, res))
> +				goto out;
> +		}
> +	}
> +out:
> +	report("SCCB page boundary violation", len > 4096 && offset == 4096);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Test excessively long SCCBs.
> + */
> +static void test_toolong(void)
> +{
> +	const uint32_t cmd = SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_DATA;
> +	const uint16_t res = SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION;
> +	WriteEventData *sccb = (WriteEventData *)sccb_template;
> +	int len;
> +
> +	memset(sccb_template, 0, sizeof(sccb_template));
> +	sccb->h.function_code = SCLP_FC_NORMAL_WRITE;
> +	for (len = 4097; len < 8192; len++) {
> +		sccb->h.length = len;
> +		if (!test_one_sccb(cmd, pagebuf, PAGE_SIZE, PGM_NONE, res))
> +			break;
> +	}
> +	report("SCCB bigger than 4k", len == 8192);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Test privileged operation.
> + */
> +static void test_priv(void)
> +{
> +	SCCBHeader *h = (SCCBHeader *)pagebuf;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("Privileged operation");
> +	h->length = 8;
> +	expect_pgm_int();
> +	enter_pstate();
> +	servc(valid_code, __pa(h));
> +	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Test addressing exceptions. We need to test SCCB addresses between the
> + * end of available memory and 2GB, because after 2GB a specification
> + * exception is also allowed.
> + * Only applicable if the VM has less than 2GB of memory
> + */
> +static void test_addressing(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long i, maxram = get_ram_size();
> +
> +	/* the VM has more than 2GB of memory */
> +	if (maxram >= 0x80000000) {
> +		report_skip("Invalid SCCB address");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +	/* test all possible valid addresses immediately after the end of memory
> +	 * up to 64KB after the end of memory
> +	 */
> +	for (i = 0; i < 0x10000 && i + maxram < 0x80000000; i += 8)
> +		if (!test_one_sccb(valid_code, MKPTR(i + maxram), 0, PGM_BIT_ADDR, 0))
> +			goto out;
> +	/* test more addresses until we reach 1MB after end of memory;
> +	 * increment by a prime number (times 8) in order to test all
> +	 * possible valid offsets inside pages
> +	 */
> +	for (; i < 0x100000 && i + maxram < 0x80000000 ; i += 808)
> +		if (!test_one_sccb(valid_code, MKPTR(i + maxram), 0, PGM_BIT_ADDR, 0))
> +			goto out;
> +	/* test the remaining addresses until we reach address 2GB;
> +	 * increment by a prime number (times 8) in order to test all
> +	 * possible valid offsets inside pages
> +	 */
> +	for (; i < 0x80000000; i += 800024)
> +		if (!test_one_sccb(valid_code, MKPTR(i + maxram), 0, PGM_BIT_ADDR, 0))
> +			goto out;
> +out:
> +	report("Invalid SCCB address", i >= 0x80000000);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Test some bits in the instruction format that are specified to be ignored.
> + */
> +static void test_instbits(void)
> +{
> +	SCCBHeader *h = (SCCBHeader *)pagebuf;
> +	int cc;
> +
> +	expect_pgm_int();
> +	sclp_mark_busy();
> +	h->length = 8;
> +	sclp_setup_int();
> +
> +	asm volatile(
> +		"       .insn   rre,0xb2204200,%1,%2\n"  /* servc %1,%2 */
> +		"       ipm     %0\n"
> +		"       srl     %0,28"
> +		: "=&d" (cc) : "d" (valid_code), "a" (__pa(pagebuf))
> +		: "cc", "memory");
> +	if (lc->pgm_int_code) {
> +		sclp_handle_ext();
> +		cc = 1;
> +	} else if (!cc)
> +		sclp_wait_busy();
> +	report("Instruction format ignored bits", cc == 0);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Find a valid SCLP command code; not all codes are always allowed, and
> + * probing should be performed in the right order.

Find valid READ INFO command code

> + */
> +static void find_valid_sclp_code(void)
> +{
> +	const unsigned int commands[] = { SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED,
> +					  SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO };
> +	SCCBHeader *h = (SCCBHeader *)pagebuf;
> +	int i, cc;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(commands); i++) {
> +		sclp_mark_busy();
> +		memset(h, 0, sizeof(*h));
> +		h->length = 4096;
> +
> +		valid_code = commands[i];
> +		cc = sclp_service_call(commands[i], h);
> +		if (cc)
> +			break;
> +		if (h->response_code == SCLP_RC_NORMAL_READ_COMPLETION)
> +			return;
> +		if (h->response_code != SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +	valid_code = 0;
> +	report_abort("READ_SCP_INFO failed");
> +}
> +
> +int main(void)
> +{
> +	report_prefix_push("sclp");
> +	find_valid_sclp_code();
> +
> +	/* Test some basic things */
> +	test_instbits();
> +	test_priv();
> +	test_addressing();
> +
> +	/* Test the specification exceptions */
> +	test_sccb_too_short();
> +	test_sccb_unaligned();
> +	test_sccb_prefix();
> +	test_sccb_high();
> +
> +	/* Test the expected response codes */
> +	test_inval();
> +	test_short();
> +	test_boundary();
> +	test_toolong();
> +
> +	return report_summary();
> +}
> diff --git a/s390x/unittests.cfg b/s390x/unittests.cfg
> index f1b07cd..75e3d37 100644
> --- a/s390x/unittests.cfg
> +++ b/s390x/unittests.cfg
> @@ -75,3 +75,6 @@ file = stsi.elf
>  [smp]
>  file = smp.elf
>  extra_params =-smp 2
> +
> +[sclp]
> +file = sclp.elf

I like Tomas' idea about the two tests.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux