On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 20:47:15 +0800 Xiang Zheng <zhengxiang9@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Beata, > > Thanks for you review! > > On 2019/11/22 23:47, Beata Michalska wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 01:48, Xiang Zheng <zhengxiang9@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> From: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Add a SIGBUS signal handler. In this handler, it checks the SIGBUS type, > >> translates the host VA delivered by host to guest PA, then fills this PA > >> to guest APEI GHES memory, then notifies guest according to the SIGBUS > >> type. > >> > >> When guest accesses the poisoned memory, it will generate a Synchronous > >> External Abort(SEA). Then host kernel gets an APEI notification and calls > >> memory_failure() to unmapped the affected page in stage 2, finally > >> returns to guest. > >> > >> Guest continues to access the PG_hwpoison page, it will trap to KVM as > >> stage2 fault, then a SIGBUS_MCEERR_AR synchronous signal is delivered to > >> Qemu, Qemu records this error address into guest APEI GHES memory and > >> notifes guest using Synchronous-External-Abort(SEA). > >> > >> In order to inject a vSEA, we introduce the kvm_inject_arm_sea() function > >> in which we can setup the type of exception and the syndrome information. > >> When switching to guest, the target vcpu will jump to the synchronous > >> external abort vector table entry. > >> > >> The ESR_ELx.DFSC is set to synchronous external abort(0x10), and the > >> ESR_ELx.FnV is set to not valid(0x1), which will tell guest that FAR is > >> not valid and hold an UNKNOWN value. These values will be set to KVM > >> register structures through KVM_SET_ONE_REG IOCTL. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Xiang Zheng <zhengxiang9@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- [...] > >> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/acpi_ghes.h b/include/hw/acpi/acpi_ghes.h > >> index cb62ec9c7b..8e3c5b879e 100644 > >> --- a/include/hw/acpi/acpi_ghes.h > >> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/acpi_ghes.h > >> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ > >> > >> #include "hw/acpi/bios-linker-loader.h" > >> > >> +#define ACPI_GHES_CPER_OK 1 > >> +#define ACPI_GHES_CPER_FAIL 0 > >> + > > > > Is there really a need to introduce those ? > > > > Don't you think it's more clear than using "1" or "0"? :) or maybe just reuse default libc return convention: 0 - ok, -1 - fail and drop custom macros > > >> /* > >> * Values for Hardware Error Notification Type field > >> */ [...]
