On 19/11/19 09:49, Yang Weijiang wrote:
> +static int is_spp_shadow_present(u64 pte)
> +{
> + return pte & PT_PRESENT_MASK;
> +}
> +
This should not be needed, is_shadow_present_pte works well for SPP PTEs
as well (and in fact you're already using it here and there, so it's
confusing to have both).
Paolo
