Jan Kiszka wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 07/24/2009 12:41 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> I vaguely recall that someone promised to add a feature reporting >>> facility for all those nice things, modern VM-extensions may or may not >>> support (something like or even an extension of /proc/cpuinfo). What is >>> the state of this plan? Would be specifically interesting for Intel CPUs >>> as there seem to be many of them out there with restrictions for special >>> use cases - like real-time. >>> >> Newer kernels do report some vmx features (like flexpriority) in >> /proc/cpuinfo but not all. >> > > Ah, nice. Then we just need this? > Fine with me. Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> However, I guess the real question if we shouldn't export ALL VMX features in a consistent way instead? -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
