Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] alloc: Add more memalign asserts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/11/19 10:20, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Let's test for size and alignment in memalign to catch invalid input
> data. Also we need to test for NULL after calling the memalign
> function of the registered alloc operations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> Tested only under s390, tests under other architectures are highly
> appreciated.
> 
> ---
>  lib/alloc.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/alloc.c b/lib/alloc.c
> index ecdbbc4..eba9dd6 100644
> --- a/lib/alloc.c
> +++ b/lib/alloc.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ void *memalign(size_t alignment, size_t size)
>  	uintptr_t blkalign;
>  	uintptr_t mem;
>  
> +	assert(size && alignment);

Do we want to return NULL instead on !size?  This is how malloc(3) is
documented.

Paolo

>  	assert(alloc_ops && alloc_ops->memalign);
>  	if (alignment <= sizeof(uintptr_t))
>  		alignment = sizeof(uintptr_t);
> @@ -56,6 +57,8 @@ void *memalign(size_t alignment, size_t size)
>  	size = ALIGN(size + METADATA_EXTRA, alloc_ops->align_min);
>  	p = alloc_ops->memalign(blkalign, size);
>  
> +	assert(p != NULL);
> +
>  	/* Leave room for metadata before aligning the result.  */
>  	mem = (uintptr_t)p + METADATA_EXTRA;
>  	mem = ALIGN(mem, alignment);
> 




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux