On 24.10.19 13:40, Janosch Frank wrote:
We need it in the next patch, when doing memory management for the
guest in the kernel's fault handler, where otherwise we wouldn't have
access to the handle.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/gmap.h | 1 +
arch/s390/kvm/pv.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/gmap.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/gmap.h
index 37f96b6f0e61..6efc0b501227 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/gmap.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/gmap.h
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ struct gmap {
spinlock_t shadow_lock;
struct gmap *parent;
unsigned long orig_asce;
+ unsigned long se_handle;
int edat_level;
bool removed;
bool initialized;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
index 94cf16f40f25..80aecd5bea9e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
@@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ int kvm_s390_pv_create_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
kvm_s390_pv_dealloc_vm(kvm);
return -EINVAL;
}
+ kvm->arch.gmap->se_handle = uvcb.guest_handle;
return rc;
}
I'd suggest squashing that into the patch that needs it.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
