On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 05:17:37PM +0200, Christian Bornträger wrote: > From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> > > There are two waitqueues in kvm for wait handling: > vcpu->wq for virt/kvm/kvm_main.c and > vpcu->arch.local_int.wq for the s390 specific wait code. > > the wait handling in kvm_s390_handle_wait was broken by using different > wait_queues for add_wait queue and remove_wait_queue. > > There are two options to fix the problem: > o move all the s390 specific code to vcpu->wq and remove > vcpu->arch.local_int.wq > o move all the s390 specific code to vcpu->arch.local_int.wq > > This patch chooses the 2nd variant for two reasons: > o s390 does not use kvm_vcpu_block but implements its own enabled wait > handling. > Having a separate wait_queue make it clear, that our wait mechanism is > different > o the patch is much smaller > > Report-by: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Index: kvm/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c > =================================================================== > --- kvm.orig/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c > +++ kvm/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c > @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ no_timer: > } > __unset_cpu_idle(vcpu); > __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); > - remove_wait_queue(&vcpu->wq, &wait); > + remove_wait_queue(&vcpu->arch.local_int.wq, &wait); > spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock); > spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock); > hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&vcpu->arch.ckc_timer); Applied, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
