On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 12:44:53AM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote: > Some values passed into "report" as "pass/fail" are larger than the > size of the parameter. Instead use a status enum so that the size of the > argument no longer matters. > > Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@xxxxxxxxxx> The threading of these mails has me all kinds of confused. What is the relationship between all these patches? Did you perhaps intend to send some of these as v2? [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] Use a status enum for reporting pass/fail [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] Use a status enum for reporting pass/fail [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/1] x86: use pointer for end of exception table [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] x86: use pointer for end of exception table
