On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:49:04PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:39:17PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:31:40PM -0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > > Start using kvm_vm_ioctl's code.
> > > For type safety, delete vm_fd from kvm_context entirely, so the
> > > compiler can play along with us helping to detect errors I might
> > > have made.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > kvm-all.c | 2 ++
> > > qemu-kvm-x86.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> > > qemu-kvm.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> > > qemu-kvm.h | 6 +++---
> > > 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ kvm_vcpu_context_t kvm_create_vcpu(CPUState *env, int id)
> > > vcpu_ctx->kvm = kvm;
> > > vcpu_ctx->id = id;
> > >
> > > - r = ioctl(kvm->vm_fd, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, id);
> > > + r = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, id);
> > > if (r == -1) {
> > > fprintf(stderr, "kvm_create_vcpu: %m\n");
> >
> >
> > int kvm_vm_ioctl(KVMState *s, int type, ...)
> > {
> > ...
> > if (ret == -1)
> > ret = -errno;
> > }
> >
> > Is that fine?
> I don't see a problem with that.
Problem is the sites in qemu-kvm.c kvm_vm_ioctl to return -1
on error, but kvm_vm_ioctl converts -1 to -errno, no?
> But even if there is, the way to change is it to convince anthony of
> the contrary. If he changes it (or anything else), we'll gain it in
> the next merge.
Or make a temporary wrapper around kvm_vm_ioctl to convert -errno back
to -1 ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
