On 10/3/19 10:02 AM, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: > Map "xen_nopvspin" to "nopvspin", fix stale description of "xen_nopvspin" > as we use qspinlock now. > > Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> with a small nit > void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void) > { > + if (nopvspin) > + xen_pvspin = false; > > /* Don't need to use pvqspinlock code if there is only 1 vCPU. */ > if (num_possible_cpus() == 1) I'd fold the change into this 'if' statement, I think it will still be clear what the comment refers to. -boris