On Friday 17 July 2009 03:14:54 Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:48:46AM -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 11:18 -0700, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:02:22AM -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
> > > > Although VMX_EPT_IDENTITY_PAGETABLE_ADDR does not appear to be used
> > > > within qemu-kvm, this change mirrors a similar change in the kernel
> > > > kvm code.
> > > >
> > > > The purpose is to move the KVM 'EPT Identity Pages' from:
> > > > 0xfffbc000-0xfffbcfff
> > > > to:
> > > > 0xfeffc000-0xfeffcfff
> > > >
> > > > The step is required to free up the 0xff000000-0xffffffff (16MB)
> > > > range for use with bios.bin.
> > > >
> > > > The KVM kernel change depends upon a change to kvm/bios/rombios.c so
> > > > the bios INT15-E820 function will properly reserve the new location.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > kvm/include/x86/asm/vmx.h | 2 +-
> > > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/kvm/include/x86/asm/vmx.h b/kvm/include/x86/asm/vmx.h
> > > > index df8d4f9..99e2bb9 100644
> > > > --- a/kvm/include/x86/asm/vmx.h
> > > > +++ b/kvm/include/x86/asm/vmx.h
> > > > @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ enum vmcs_field {
> > > > #define VMX_EPT_EXECUTABLE_MASK 0x4ull
> > > > #define VMX_EPT_IGMT_BIT (1ull << 6)
> > > >
> > > > -#define VMX_EPT_IDENTITY_PAGETABLE_ADDR 0xfffbc000ul
> > > > +#define VMX_EPT_IDENTITY_PAGETABLE_ADDR 0xfeffc000ul
> > >
> > > Won't this conflict with an older BIOS? (the e820 reserved entry on
> > > older qemu-kvm+bios will not cover the EPT identity table on kernels
> > > with this patch).
> > >
> > > Perhaps add a new ioctl (similar to the tss one) to so userspace can
> > > set the address?
> >
> > I am not very familiar with the reasons why the EPT identity
> > page-table setup is happening within the kernel.
> >
> > As it stands, there is the shared knowledge that the qemu-kvm bios
> > just happens to know that the kvm kernel code has reserved a
> > particular page of the address space.
> >
> > It would be much easier to coordinate all the pieces if it were
> > all setup on the qemu-kvm side.
> >
> > Is this possible?
>
> It is possible but all of the EPT implementation is in the kernel, so it
> does not make much sense to have the details of the identity table in
> qemu-kvm.
>
> The address of it though can be controlled by qemu-kvm.
>
> Sheng?
Put the identity map into kernel space because we want older version QEmu can
also work with EPT.
Yes, we need a new CAP for address. Would do it soon.
--
regards
Yang, Sheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
