Zan Lynx wrote: > Gregory Haskins wrote: >> Gregory Haskins wrote: >>> Note that if we are going to generalize the interface to support other >>> guests as you may have been suggesting above, it should probably stay >>> statically linked (and perhaps live in ./lib or something) >>> >> >> More specifically, it can no longer live in kvm.ko. I guess it >> technically doesn't have to be statically linked, though (e.g. >> xinterface.ko is fine, too). > > Speaking as someone who knows nothing about this, if this is going to > be a module and visible in places like lsmod, could you name it > something else? > > I see "xinterface.ko" and the first thing in my head is "something to > do with the X Window System." > > How about kvm_xinterface or vguest_xinterface? > Heh, I totally agree. That was just pseudo-naming, anyway. ;) If it was going to be generic, I would do something like "virt-xinterface.ko". Kind Regards, -Greg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
