On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Sheng Yang<sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Make sense to me. So what's mattered here is not bios, but qemu-kvm and kvm > code. The user can replace bios binary by UEFI binary easily, but not with kvm > related part. > > I realized you still need separate the qemu-kvm patch into two: one for bios > and another for qemu. Okay, I will split this change apart. > And I just hope this modification won't break some old > OS(any OS got assumption about bios size? I think Tiano team should have idea > on it)... I don't think the OS should care about the bios size, but it is important to update the INT15-E820 memory ranges to help make sure the OS knows which regions are in use. Even without the E820 change, I think it would be unlikely for an OS to try utilize these memory regions, but it is definitely better to properly describe it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
