[kvm-unit-tests PULL 10/17] s390x: Fix stsi unaligned test and add selector tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Alignment and selectors test order is not specified and so, if you
have an unaligned address and invalid selectors it's up to the
hypervisor to decide which error is presented.

Let's add valid selectors to the unalignmnet test and add selector
tests.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 s390x/stsi.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/s390x/stsi.c b/s390x/stsi.c
index 7232cb0..c5bd0a2 100644
--- a/s390x/stsi.c
+++ b/s390x/stsi.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static void test_specs(void)
 
 	report_prefix_push("unaligned");
 	expect_pgm_int();
-	stsi(pagebuf + 42, 1, 0, 0);
+	stsi(pagebuf + 42, 1, 1, 1);
 	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION);
 	report_prefix_pop();
 
@@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ static inline unsigned long stsi_get_fc(void *addr)
 static void test_fc(void)
 {
 	report("invalid fc",  stsi(pagebuf, 7, 0, 0) == 3);
+	report("invalid selector 1", stsi(pagebuf, 1, 0, 1) == 3);
+	report("invalid selector 2", stsi(pagebuf, 1, 1, 0) == 3);
 	report("query fc >= 2",  stsi_get_fc(pagebuf) >= 2);
 }
 
-- 
2.18.1




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux