Gentle ping. > On 19 Sep 2019, at 17:08, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Liran Alon <liran.alon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Hi, >> >> This patch series aims to add a vmx test to verify the functionality >> introduced by KVM commit: >> 4b9852f4f389 ("KVM: x86: Fix INIT signal handling in various CPU states") >> >> The test verifies the following functionality: >> 1) An INIT signal received when CPU is in VMX operation >> is latched until it exits VMX operation. >> 2) If there is an INIT signal pending when CPU is in >> VMX non-root mode, it result in VMExit with (reason == 3). >> 3) Exit from VMX non-root mode on VMExit do not clear >> pending INIT signal in LAPIC. >> 4) When CPU exits VMX operation, pending INIT signal in >> LAPIC is processed. >> >> In order to write such a complex test, the vmx tests framework was >> enhanced to support using VMX in non BSP CPUs. This enhancement is >> implemented in patches 1-7. The test itself is implemented at patch 8. >> This enhancement to the vmx tests framework is a bit hackish, but >> I believe it's OK because this functionality is rarely required by >> other VMX tests. >> > > Tested-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks! > > -- > Vitaly