On Fri, 20 Sep 2019, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 20/09/19 08:27, Suleiman Souhlal wrote: > > To do that, I am changing kvmclock to request to the host to copy > > its timekeeping parameters (mult, base, cycle_last, etc), so that > > the guest timekeeper can use the same values, so that time can > > be synchronized between the guest and the host. > > > > Any suggestions or feedback would be highly appreciated. > > I'm not a timekeeping maintainer, but I don't think the > kernel/time/timekeeping.c changes are acceptable. Indeed. #ifdef WHATEVERTHEHECK does not go anywhere. If at all this needs to be a runtime switch, but I have yet to understand the whole picture of this. Thanks, tglx
