On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 8:24 AM Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is a misleading name, e.g. it took me quite a while to realize this > is testing only the passing scenario. For me, "limit test" implies that > it'd be deliberately exceeding the limit, or at least testing both the > passing and failing cases. I suppose we can't easily test the VMX abort > cases, but we can at least test VM_ENTER_LOAD. It's hard to test for "undefined behavior may result." :-) One could check to see if the test is running under KVM, and then check for the behavior that Marc's other patch introduces, but even that is implementation-dependent.
