On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:52:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2019/9/11 上午9:47, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 04:19:34PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > This path introduces a new mdev transport for virtio. This is used to
> > > use kernel virtio driver to drive the mediated device that is capable
> > > of populating virtqueue directly.
> > >
> > > A new virtio-mdev driver will be registered to the mdev bus, when a
> > > new virtio-mdev device is probed, it will register the device with
> > > mdev based config ops. This means, unlike the exist hardware
> > > transport, this is a software transport between mdev driver and mdev
> > > device. The transport was implemented through:
> > >
> > > - configuration access was implemented through parent_ops->read()/write()
> > > - vq/config callback was implemented through parent_ops->ioctl()
> > >
> > > This transport is derived from virtio MMIO protocol and was wrote for
> > > kernel driver. But for the transport itself, but the design goal is to
> > > be generic enough to support userspace driver (this part will be added
> > > in the future).
> > >
> > > Note:
> > > - current mdev assume all the parameter of parent_ops was from
> > > userspace. This prevents us from implementing the kernel mdev
> > > driver. For a quick POC, this patch just abuse those parameter and
> > > assume the mdev device implementation will treat them as kernel
> > > pointer. This should be addressed in the formal series by extending
> > > mdev_parent_ops.
> > > - for a quick POC, I just drive the transport from MMIO, I'm pretty
> > > there's lot of optimization space for this.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/vfio/mdev/Kconfig | 7 +
> > > drivers/vfio/mdev/Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/vfio/mdev/virtio_mdev.c | 500 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/uapi/linux/virtio_mdev.h | 131 ++++++++
> > > 4 files changed, 639 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/mdev/virtio_mdev.c
> > > create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/virtio_mdev.h
> > >
> > [...]
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_mdev.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_mdev.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..8040de6b960a
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_mdev.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
> > > +/*
> > > + * Virtio mediated device driver
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright 2019, Red Hat Corp.
> > > + *
> > > + * Based on Virtio MMIO driver by ARM Ltd, copyright ARM Ltd. 2011
> > > + *
> > > + * This header is BSD licensed so anyone can use the definitions to implement
> > > + * compatible drivers/servers.
> > > + *
> > > + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> > > + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
> > > + * are met:
> > > + * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> > > + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> > > + * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
> > > + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
> > > + * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
> > > + * 3. Neither the name of IBM nor the names of its contributors
> > > + * may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
> > > + * without specific prior written permission.
> > > + * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
> > > + * ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
> > > + * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
> > > + * ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL IBM OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
> > > + * FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
> > > + * DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
> > > + * OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
> > > + * HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
> > > + * LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
> > > + * OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
> > > + * SUCH DAMAGE.
> > > + */
> > > +#ifndef _LINUX_VIRTIO_MDEV_H
> > > +#define _LINUX_VIRTIO_MDEV_H
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > > +#include <linux/vringh.h>
> > > +#include <uapi/linux/virtio_net.h>
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * Ioctls
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +struct virtio_mdev_callback {
> > > + irqreturn_t (*callback)(void *);
> > > + void *private;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV 0xAF
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_SET_VQ_CALLBACK _IOW(VIRTIO_MDEV, 0x00, \
> > > + struct virtio_mdev_callback)
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_SET_CONFIG_CALLBACK _IOW(VIRTIO_MDEV, 0x01, \
> > > + struct virtio_mdev_callback)
> > > +
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_DEVICE_API_STRING "virtio-mdev"
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * Control registers
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +/* Magic value ("virt" string) - Read Only */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_MAGIC_VALUE 0x000
> > > +
> > > +/* Virtio device version - Read Only */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_VERSION 0x004
> > > +
> > > +/* Virtio device ID - Read Only */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_DEVICE_ID 0x008
> > > +
> > > +/* Virtio vendor ID - Read Only */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_VENDOR_ID 0x00c
> > > +
> > > +/* Bitmask of the features supported by the device (host)
> > > + * (32 bits per set) - Read Only */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_DEVICE_FEATURES 0x010
> > > +
> > > +/* Device (host) features set selector - Write Only */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_DEVICE_FEATURES_SEL 0x014
> > > +
> > > +/* Bitmask of features activated by the driver (guest)
> > > + * (32 bits per set) - Write Only */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_DRIVER_FEATURES 0x020
> > > +
> > > +/* Activated features set selector - Write Only */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_DRIVER_FEATURES_SEL 0x024
> > > +
> > > +/* Queue selector - Write Only */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_SEL 0x030
> > > +
> > > +/* Maximum size of the currently selected queue - Read Only */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_NUM_MAX 0x034
> > > +
> > > +/* Queue size for the currently selected queue - Write Only */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_NUM 0x038
> > > +
> > > +/* Ready bit for the currently selected queue - Read Write */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_READY 0x044
> > > +
> > > +/* Alignment of virtqueue - Read Only */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_ALIGN 0x048
> > > +
> > > +/* Queue notifier - Write Only */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_NOTIFY 0x050
> > > +
> > > +/* Device status register - Read Write */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_STATUS 0x060
> > > +
> > > +/* Selected queue's Descriptor Table address, 64 bits in two halves */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_DESC_LOW 0x080
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_DESC_HIGH 0x084
> > > +
> > > +/* Selected queue's Available Ring address, 64 bits in two halves */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_AVAIL_LOW 0x090
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_AVAIL_HIGH 0x094
> > > +
> > > +/* Selected queue's Used Ring address, 64 bits in two halves */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_USED_LOW 0x0a0
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_USED_HIGH 0x0a4
> > > +
> > > +/* Configuration atomicity value */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_CONFIG_GENERATION 0x0fc
> > > +
> > > +/* The config space is defined by each driver as
> > > + * the per-driver configuration space - Read Write */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_CONFIG 0x100
> > IIUC, we can use above registers with virtio-mdev parent's
> > read()/write() to access the mdev device from kernel driver.
> > As you suggested, it's a choice to build vhost-mdev on top
> > of this abstraction as well. But virtio is the frontend
> > device which lacks some vhost backend features, e.g. get
> > vring base, set vring base, negotiate vhost features, etc.
> > So I'm wondering, does it make sense to reserve some space
> > for vhost-mdev in kernel to do vhost backend specific setups?
> > Or do you have any other thoughts?
>
>
> Good point. It's just a quick POC, I plan to add vhost features in the next
> release:
>
> 1) set/get virtqueue state (e.g vring base)
> 2) dirty page tracking
> 3) for vhost features, if you mean _F_LOG_ALL, it could be done by 2), for
> IOTLB, it requires more thought on the API since current IOTLB API is no
> implemented through ioctl ...
>
>
> >
> > Besides, I'm also wondering, what's the purpose of making
> > above registers part of UAPI?
>
>
> Sorry if it brings confusion. If we do vhost-mdev on top of this, there's no
> need for this to go for UAPI.
>
>
> > And if we make them part
> > of UAPI, do we also need to make them part of virtio spec?
>
>
> Yes, but I do not think we should put it into UAPI. Technically, userspace
> can use this transport as well with some modification on the interrupt part,
> e.g using eventfd. But is there any value for doing this instead of vhost?
Yeah, I agree. As we already have vhost, I don't see the value
to make virtio become "virtio + vhost".
Thanks,
Tiwei
